Volkswagen is launching an electric car with a vegan apple leather interior


Tesla’s electric cars have proved popular with environmentalists seeking ways to reduce their carbon footprints, so much so that the company took its green credentials one step further by switching all of its models leather interiors to a vegan-friendly alternative.

In a bid to rival Tesla’s vegan automobiles and capitalise on the growing demand from customers seeking out ways to reduce their impact on the planet, Volkswagen is going green with the release of a seven-seater electric SUV complete with an innovative interior made with apple leather.

The car, named the D. Roomzz, was unveiled at the Shanghai Motor Show and boasts a completely vegan interior made from AppleSkin, a sustainable leather alternative that is partly made from apple-juice waste such as the cores and skin from the fruit. Volkswagen has described it as a ‘renewable raw material’.

According to the Apple Nine Alliance: “Apple Peel Skin is an innovative and highly sustainable hybrid material (Vegan-leather) made in Italy, which integrates organic apple peels into the skin of the material, making it an Eco-Friendly alternative for those who care about the environment and animals.

“Our Apple Peel Skin Vegan-Leather is the first material certified as an Ethical Vegan product by the exclusive European certification body VeganOk.”

Volkswagen joins the likes of Volvo who recently launched the Polestar 2, a new all-electric five-door fastback that boasts a completely vegan interior made ‘with progressive textiles’ as part of its ongoing commitment to creating eco-friendly solutions to address the world’s air quality challenges.

WhatsApp Group Link: Vegan Fashion Broadcast



WhatsApp Group Link: Vegan Fashion Broadcast

To join, DM at any of our socialmedia page 
or 
Email your whatsapp no to:
vegan@sudesh.org


Vegan Models, Fashion & Activism


We should highlight some of the sexier things in the vegan world. There are many perks to eating a more plant based diet but one of the best is the radiant physical beauty.

instagr.am/vegan.model page is about our multimedia project promoting veganism by exposing vegan beauty, strength and diversity. 

 

This is a project by Vegan Sudesh. Our team is set out to do photoshoots with vegan men and women to really show the aesthetic side of the lifestyle. 


Vegan Sudesh
Vegan Fashion & Activism



Animal Welfare (Factory Farming) Amendment Bill was debated in parliament and passed into law, making the ACT the first jurisdiction in Australia to legislate against factory farming


Introduced by Shane Rattenbury MLA, Minister for Territory and Municipal Services, the Act is the successful product of seven factory farming bills and six attempts by the ACT Greens to ban battery cages. In total, the Act prohibits the use of cages for commercial egg production, the debeaking of chickens and the use of sow stalls and farrowing crates for pigs in the ACT.

Battery Cages

The new laws effectively ban the use of ‘battery cages’ and ‘enriched cages’, by omitting them from the definition of what constitutes ‘appropriate accommodation’. The ACT Government made some progress in banning the use of cage egg farming in 2012 when they entered into an agreement with Pace Farm, formally the territory’s only battery cage operator. Pace agreed to convert its egg facility into a cage-free system by 15 May 2016. The new Act takes into account this agreement by introducing a transitional provision to allow this arrangement to take place.

Debeaking

The Act also bans the debeaking of hens, a process whereby a hen’s beak is removed with a hot blade or laser. Debeaking is common practice in intensive farming systems where hens often become frustrated and aggressive as a consequence of their inability to exhibit natural behaviours. Debeaking was introduced to prevent the hen-pecking, bullying and cannibalism exhibited by factory farmed hens. While this practice is known to cause both acute and chronic pain, it is generally performed without the use of pain relief. With the passing of this legislation, the ACT becomes the first Australian state to expressly prohibit this cruel practice.

Sow Stalls

The Act makes it illegal for sows to be kept in sow stalls or farrowing crates. In Australia,  thousands of sows are kept in  sow stalls and farrowing crates which are so small they prevent mother pigs from being able to take a step forward or backwards, turn around, or comfortably stand from a seated position (and vice-versa). While there are no sow stalls currently in use in the ACT, the passing of this Act will prevent their introduction and hopefully set a precedent for other states to introduce similar reforms.

Penalties

The Act also introduces a maximum penalty for a prosecution for cage egg farming, debeaking of a hen and keeping a pig in less than appropriate accommodation of 50 penalty units (currently $7,000 for an individual or $35,000 for a corporation).
The passing of this Act is a significant step forward for the animal protection movement. It recognises that the quality of the lives of the animals we use for food matters. That they are not machines, but sentient creatures who experience extreme pain and stress when raised in intensive conditions and that the law should protect them from suffering. In the words of Shane Rattenbury “[t]his bill will send a strong message to the rest of the nation that the intensive confinement of pigs and layer hens is no longer considered acceptable”.

By Emmanuel Giuffre (Voiceless Legal Counsel) and Reeve Koelmeyer (Legal Intern)

Slaughter of Australia National Emblem – Stop it!


Stop Slaughtering Australia's National Emblem

 

Kangaroos are one of the world's most recognizable and cherished animals. Kangaroos are endemic to the country of Australia. The kangaroo is a national symbol of Australia: its emblem is used on the Australian coat of arms, on its currency, as well as by some of Australia's best known organisations, including Qantas. The kangaroo is important to both Australian culture and the national image and consequently there are numerous popular culture references.

 

People travel to Australia from all over the globe to view these iconic marsupials. What many don't know is that kangaroos are currently being slaughtered by the millions every year to supply the international trade in kangaroo leather and meat. This mass killing is the largest human massacre of terrestrial wildlife on the planet.

 

About three million kangaroos are killed commercially in Australia every year, which has led to a population reduction of 50 percent over the past five years. These statistics, however, do not include the joeys (baby kangaroos) who are left to die or are killed when their mothers are killed. It also does not include the number of illegal and non-commercial killings. Adding these numbers into the total greatly increases the scale of this slaughter.

 

Australia bears the shame of being responsible for the largest commercial wildlife slaughter in the world.

 

Each night in the Australian outback thousands of kangaroos graze peacefully, stand up on hearing an approaching vehicle, stare into a blinding spotlight, and are shot for their meat and skins. This year, almost 4 million kangaroos are allowed to be killed commercially. The fate of orphaned young is at least as grim. Joeys are decapitated or killed with a blow to the head. If they escape, they often fall victim to predators, exposure or starvation. Australians would never accept this were they to bear witness to this cruelty. This relentless cruelty is authorised by government in the name of profit and landholder pressure.

 

A new trade protocol between Australia and China now opens the door for the industry to export kangaroo meat and skins to China. But the Chinese are worried about their reputation as they are well aware of the iconic status of Kangaroos. Also, worries exist about food safety issues after Russia announced a total ban on importing Kangaroos meat for this reason.

 

Due to pressures from the commercial industry, landholders and drought, kangaroo populations have dropped by approximately 60% since 2001 and more in some areas of Australia (according to the Department of Environment and Climate Change's own data). The average age of a red kangaroo shot is now just 2 years when in their natural state these animals can live to 25 years.


The Global Campaign to Stop Animal Sacrifice

SUDESH KUMAR FOUNDATION

www.sudeshkumar.org

Email: stop.animal.sacrifice@sudeshkumar.org

 

JOIN: facebook.com/StopAnimalSacrifice


WATCH: youtube.com/StopAnimalSacrifice


Animal Slaughter brings Earthquake

 
Book Review
Understanding Earthquakes

M M Bajaj, Ibrahim and Vijayraj Singh

H. B. Prakashan, Indore


A Plea to Stop Animal Slaughter, Via Science Now!

 

This book is a plea to stop slaughter of animals, birds, and (even) fish because it will avert earthquakes. It is difficult to say what prompted the authors – all physicists of fame and high learning – to enter the rough and tumble of geology and that, too, of earthquakes. But, then, science has its own angularities. After all, the high priest of modern science, Albert Einstein, also meddled with the science of geology by propagating EPW (Einsteinian Pain Waves) theory.

 

Whatever one's predilections, it has to be conceded that the idea is unique. And novelty is not the only argument in favour of the book which is actually based on paper(s) read by the authors. The BIS (Bajaj-Ibrahim-Singh) Theory is claimed to be a further development on EPW of Einstein. The book claims it is possible to forecast earthquakes which are caused by excessive killing of animals. Now either it is all based on 'real' correlations or is a set of spurious ones. The answer would depend upon whether, and a priori, one is willing to subscribe to the theory whose validity is all but proven so far. And to that extent, the book is truly novel and hence absolutely and eminently readable. After all, science still does not have even the modicum of an answer as to why the earthquakes happen and how they can be predicted with reasonable accuracy. The book certainly fills the gaps in the science of seismology which is still a nascent science.

 

The argument, otherwise highly technical and full of scientific jargon, given so lucidly and simply in the abstract of the book is quite unique to say the least. It is based on the, "reports received" from different parts of the world that several earthquakes have the history of millions of animals being butchered in or near the high risk seismic zones. Hence the suspicion and the scientific inquiry that organising the butchering of animals in the abattoirs worldwide has something to do with the quakes. The book claims to have studied the complex role of nociceptive waves (or the waves generated by the immense noise by the animals on the verge of being butchered) in shear-wave splitting which is related to seismic anisotropy. This splitting is associated with the cracks in the crust aligned by stress. The origin of earthquakes due to the interaction of nociception waves with gravity waves is critically examined in the book. An earthquake of 8 Richter occurs only when the resonant frequency is extremely high. Low frequency resonances lead to earthquakes of 0.1 to 0.2 Richter. Low frequency resonances are hardly felt or realised by the ordinary people. High frequency resonances (originating due to the slaughter of millions of animals daily for years together) lead to powerful singularities with the gravity waves.

 

Dying Animals Cause Acoustic Anisotropy

 

Now the point which the authors have tried to make is that acoustic anisotropy leads to a very strong anisotropic stress on a rock. The daily butchering of thousands of animals continually for several years generates acoustic anisotropy due to Einsteinian Pain Waves (EPW) emitted by dying animals. And the accumulated acoustic anisotropy is found to be related with the stress history of rocks.

 

The book claims that since the EPW travel a great distance with time, abattoirs of one country may lead to havoc in another country. But then comes a final "warning" from the scientists laced with spirituality: '...we should close down all the abattoirs (visible and hidden) of the world. Our environmental problems are responsible for the mega-event of earthquakes. ' If this had come from a religious saint, people would have taken it at face value. But, coming from scientists of some fame, the approach needs a careful analysis sans religiosity which is a tall order given the Indian context.

 

The central theme of the book that shear wave splitting occurs possibly due to aligned fluid-filled inclusions and abattoirs, is open to question, and needs a further in-depth study, which the authors claimed to have done with a promise that a fresh book of over 600 pages is coming out shortly on this very aspect. However, the authors have been fair to mention, if not examine in the introductary part, all existing hypotheses on the subject though finally, they settle down on their own hypothesis of large-scale abattoir activity being the causative agents for major earthquakes. In chapter 2 they move to the complex theory which is a set of mathematical formulae which may not be of much interest to a person not properly initiated in mathematical and statistical mumbo jumbo.

 

Latur Ealthquake Explained

 

It is "Experimental Aspects" in chapter 3 which is absolutely revolutionary and candid. After preliminary observation as to how the nociception waves (EPW) interact with the earth's natural rhythmatic vibrations and lead to responses which are extremely powerful (of the order of 10 40 MW) causing crack density (CD) which is directly proportional to EPW – itself a result of 'animals butchered daily' the authors come straight to the most recent of the Indian calamities – the Latur (Khillari) earthquake. And from here it is a non-stop journey to earthquakes at various places. Indian earthquakes of Utterkashi, Assam follow the Latur tragedy. Then comes America where the earthquakes of Northridge (1994), Long Beach (California – 1933), Landers (California -1992), San Francisco (1906), New Madrid (Missouri – 1811-12) have been mentioned. Russia is next where Neftegorsk (1995) finds a major mention. Kanto (1923), Nobi (1891), Kita-Tango. (1927), Sankiru Tsunami (1933), Shizuoka (1935), Tonankal (1944), Nankai (1948), Fukui (1948), Off-Tokachi (1952), Kjta-Mino (1961), Nigata (1964), Off-Tokachi (1968), Kobe (1995) – all of Japan – have also been described not so much as a part of scientific inquiry but to demonstrate the pattern and familiarity of the authors with what they are talking about.

 

Some of the data accumulated from aforementioned places, juxtaposed with the famous study by Nemichand has been put to productive use by the authors to make a comprehensive table of strong earthquakes of the 20th century and the date from 3,937 ,,officially recognised major abbatoirs" in different parts of India to establish further the hypothesis proprounded that earthquakes are caused by large scale animal slaughter. Some of the obiter dicta by the authors are certainly open to serious question.

 

The "Theory" will be Tested

 

The hypothesis propounded in the book will be testable very shortly when in the wake of "Mad Cow" disease afflicting cows in England resulting in an overall ban on exports of beef from England to other European Union countries there is a proposal for the 'destruction' of an estimated 4.5 million to 11 million cows in England. Whatever the number of cows destroyed eventually it will surely be the first time in the world anywhere that so many animals will be killed at one go. And going by the BIS Theory it must (automatically) produce a major earthquake. And going by the same, BIS analysis, England or at least neighbouring Europe can hope to have the biggest jolt in history - not figuratively but literally – in the shape of an earthquake.

 

From the Book

 

In the words of Nils Bohr, 'Prediction is difficult, especially of the future.' Despite this, one of the objectives of the present investigation is to explore the possibility of earthquake prediction based on well defined hard core principles.

 

Mathematicians and scholars can predict the tides. Then, why do they have so much trouble in predicting earthquakes? Accurate tables of the time of high or low tide can be worked out months or even years ahead. Earthquake forecasts often go wrong within a few days, sometimes within a few hours. People are accustomed to the difference. They are not surprised when a heat wave turns out to be a blizzard. In contrast, if the tide table predicted low tide but the beach was under water, there would probably be a riot. Of course, the two systems are different. The mechanism of earthquakes is extremely complex. It involves following parameters: (1) air pressure, (2) tectonic plate movement, (3) Einsteinian pain wave intensity, (4) geographical location, (5) local rate of killing of animals, (6) underground nuclear testing, (7) faultlines in the rock, (8) volcanic activity, etc. Compared to earthquakes, tides are much simpler, because they can be easily predicted.

 

We speak of the unpredictable aspects of earthquakes just as if we were talking about rolling dice or letting an air balloon loose to observe its erratic path as the air is ejected. Since there is no clear relationship between cause and effect, such phenomenon are said to have random elements. Yet there was little reason to doubt that precise predictability could, in principle, be achieved. This fundamental randomness has come to be called chaos.

 

The Global Campaign to Stop Animal Sacrifice

SUDESH KUMAR FOUNDATION

Email: stop.animal.sacrifice@sudeshkumar.org

 

JOIN: facebook.com/StopAnimalSacrifice

WATCH: youtube.com/StopAnimalSacrifice

 

 

Netherlands Animal Rights Police

 

Netherlands Animal Rights Police by anti-Islam Party

 

If it sounds like an idea inspired by the Animal Planet show "Animal Cops," it's because it was. There will soon be 500 police officers on the streets of Holland protecting the welfare of the country's animals. The proposal originated with a uniquely powerful animal rights political party -- and brought to fruition by Geert Wilders' anti-Islam Party for Freedom.

 

Even the enforcement of animal welfare can be a tricky issue when a chief proponent is one of Europe's most out-spoken and well-known far-right politicians, known more for his calls to ban the Koran than for his defense of the puppy next door. The Netherlands will soon have 500 new "animal police" officers, thanks to a move from Geert Wilder's anti-Islam Party for Freedom (PVV).

 

As part of the government coalition agreement signed in the Netherlands last fall, Wilders pushed for the 3,000 officers who were once slated to be cut from the police force to be retained, but with 500 of them reassigned to work on animal welfare issues. It was reportedly the pet issue of Dion Graus, a PVV member of the House of Representatives whose previous jobs include selling cars and veterinary products.

 

The new "animal police" will consist of regular police officers, with the same powers, but with special training that is still being developed, said Job van der Sande, spokesperson for the Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice. The first 100 should be in place by the end of the year.

 

The Party for the Animals

 

The proposal originated with The Party for the Animals (PvdD), a party in the Dutch parliament that is the first of its kind in the world -- a political party elected by the people to represent the animals. The Party for the Animals first entered Parliament in 2006, and now holds two of the 150 seats in the Dutch House of Representatives, one seat in the Dutch Senate, and nine seats in eight provincial governments.

 

Marianne Thieme, chairperson of The Party for the Animals, said the original idea for the new officers came from the TV show "Animal Cops," a popular program on Animal Planet in the Netherlands and in other European countries, including Germany. "Animal Cops" chronicles the work of animal welfare officers in different US cities, including Houston, Philadelphia and Phoenix.

 

Thieme said her party supports the new animal police, but is waiting to see how they work in practice. "We think it's a good idea, of course, as an animal rights party we are always in favor of working for animal welfare," Thieme told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "But at the same time they are cutting budgets for people to enforce the laws for animal transport and slaughterhouses ... We are afraid that these animal cops are only to protect pets and not for livestock, for example."

 

The Netherlands is a major meat exporter, and about 450 million animals are slaughtered each year in the country, according to the animal rights party. Details on what duties the police will actually perform are still being worked out with the country's Agriculture Ministry, said van der Sande, and a proposed plan should be ready in the next few weeks.

 

'We Don't Make Fun of It'

 

Amsterdam police chief Bernard Welten, who has taken issue with PVV proposals in the past, has publicly referred to the new force as the "guinea pig police," but a spokesman for the Dutch police chiefs' organization says his commission is taking the new force seriously.

 

"It has a public demand, and it has a political demand, so we don't make fun of it," said spokesperson Jelle Egas. He said it remains to be decided which officers will take part in the new force.

 

Until now, most animal cruelty cases in Holland have been investigated by a private entity, the Dutch Society for the Protection of Animals. Founded in 1865, the organization has more than 200,000 members and employs 14 full-time investigators. Along with 150 volunteers, the investigators are dispatched on 8,000 calls a year, says Casper Schrijver, spokesperson for the organization.

 

The calls might include anything from pets not being taken to the vet in a timely manner to something as drastic as a case that recently generated local headlines in which a dog owner reportedly stabbed his pet three times. Schrijver says they support the new animal cops, but the laws have to be changed so judges can more easily sentence offenders for their crimes. Such changes, he says, are under discussion, but it "is a long and hard road."

 

Still, they are likely to find support amongst the populace. According to Schrijver, some 60 percent of Dutch people rank animal welfare as an important issue. And it's an effort that is being watched abroad: About 74 percent of readers surveyed by a regional German newspaper in Saxony thought Germany should have animal cops, too.

 

By Mary Beth Warner @ Der Spiegel /03/03/2011

 

SUDESH KUMAR FOUNDATION

www.sudeshkumar.org


JOIN: facebook.com/StopAnimalSacrifice

WATCH: youtube.com/StopAnimalSacrifice